本文已被:浏览 666次 下载 96次
投稿时间:2016-09-09 修订日期:2016-10-31
投稿时间:2016-09-09 修订日期:2016-10-31
中文摘要: 尾矿坝稳定计算方法常用简化毕肖普法及瑞典圆弧法,当二者计算结果存在冲突时,应分析其合理性。通过对某尾矿坝稳定计算结果的分析,当坝基有深厚较软地层时,瑞典圆弧法不适用,故推荐采用简化毕肖普法作为尾矿坝稳定计算主要方法。
Abstract:Bishop simplified method and Sweden arc method are commonly used in tailings dam stability calculation, when there is a conflict between the results of the two methods, we should analyze each rationality. With analysis on a tailings dam calculation result’s rationality, Sweden arc method is not applicable when there is a deep relatively soft formation, and then Bishop simplified method is recommended as the main calculation method for stability calculation of tailings dam.
文章编号: 中图分类号: 文献标志码:
基金项目:“赣鄱英才555工程”领军人才培养计划项目
作者 | 单位 | |
刘瀚和* | 中国瑞林工程技术有限公司 | liuhanhe@nerin.com |
Author Name | Affiliation | |
Liu Han-he | China Nerin Engineering Co.,Ltd.,Nanchang | liuhanhe@nerin.com |
引用文本:
刘瀚和.某尾矿坝稳定计算成果合理性分析[J].有色金属(矿山部分),2017,69(1):.
Liu Han-he.Rationality analysis of a tailings dam stability calculation results[J].NONFERROUS METALS(Mining Section),2017,69(1):.
刘瀚和.某尾矿坝稳定计算成果合理性分析[J].有色金属(矿山部分),2017,69(1):.
Liu Han-he.Rationality analysis of a tailings dam stability calculation results[J].NONFERROUS METALS(Mining Section),2017,69(1):.